Remake Rumble: Flowers In The Attic (1987) vs Flowers In The Attic (2014)


Final Verdict

The original film had it’s selling points, most notably a great performance by Louise Fletcher, but refusing to take the full subject matter of the source material head on and cowering from it was a mistake. The remake embraced the controversial aspects (if doing so a bit gingerly) and featured better performances by it’s young cast than the original film had. That gives the Lifetime FLOWERS IN THE ATTIC film the nod in this battle.


  1. janey · July 9, 2016

    worst review ever


    • Derek · July 10, 2016

      My heart breaks at your negative review of my review.


    • Tripp · August 14

      You can’t say that just because he said that the new was better.


    • Tripp Cory · August 30

      You can’t say that just because he liked the new one better.


  2. Holly · September 16, 2016

    I agree it is a horrible review


  3. DuchessC · August 12, 2018

    AWFUL review, EVERYONE in 87 did a better job than the cast of 2014 and not to be rude but I found the 2014 adaption to be very hard to sit through as the movie was not good AT ALL!!!


    • Markos · November 3, 2018

      That’s an opinion, you can’t say it’s a terrible review just because your opinion differs..


  4. Tony · January 18

    This is a good review, even though I disagree with several things. In the original film, they actually DID try to add the incest, but it didn’t get past the censors. As far as Kristy Swanson, VC Andrews herself said that Kristy embodied exactly what she thought Cathy should look like and I agree. Kiernan Shipka was okay but, in my opinion, miscast. I think all the other kids were better in the original version as well, including Chris. Cory was EXACTLY as described in the book, curly hair and all. I absolutely agree about Louise Fletcher being much more terrifying than Ellen Burstyn and Heather Graham was much better than Victoria Tenant, based on her looks alone, even though I liked her acting as well. The book describes Corrine as being a very attractive blonde and Heather definitely fit that. With that being said, even though the incest is an important part of the story, the original didn’t need that to be the better movie, at least for me. The original is darker, more gothic, has better music, a scarier grandmother, and you actually felt for those kids. The remake doesn’t seem as sad or creepy, doesn’t have the great ending of the original (whether it was in the book or not) and the kids were miscast.


  5. katie lanigan · May 18

    I think the original flowers in the attic is butter then the remake


    • Derek · May 24

      I can see why you would think so. I thought it was very close with the remake taking the nod but not by much.


  6. Tripp · August 14

    Don’t pay any attention to all the negative comments. I agree with your review whole heartedly. The protagonists were far better in the new and the antagonists were far better in the old.


  7. Tripp Cory · August 30

    Just ignore all these means comments. You brought up great points in your review! It’s wonderful!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.